Child Support Collection Just Got a Little Easier

Most people would agree that financially supporting your children is the right thing to do, including paying any child support ordered by a family law court, if your children live with their other parent. The Court of Special Appeals in Maryland recently had to remind one parent who felt differently about that truism. In the case of Kelly v. Montgomery County Office of Child Enforcement (“OCSE”), No. 2504, Sept. Term, 2014 (filed Feb. 24, 2016) (Judges Kehoe, Leahy & Raker).

In the Kelly case, Mr. Kelly owed $9,867.00 for back child support which amount had been reduced to a judgment against him to make it easier for the mother to collect. When OCSE attempted to garnish $2,705.00 from Mr. Kelly’s bank accounts, he objected, lost, and appealed. The family law court ruled that OCSE could garnish Mr. Kelly’s bank accounts under Maryland Law Family Law Article §10-108.3(b)(1), “if an obligor  . . . has not paid child support for more than 60 days, the Administration may institute an action to attach and seize the amount of the arrearage in one or more of the accounts of the obligor with a financial institution to satisfy the amount of arrearage owed by the obligor.”

It’s difficult not to be critical of Mr. Kelly’s appeal because the cost of filing an appeal probably exceeded the $2,705.00 that he sought not to pay the child’s mother. However pyrrhic any legal victory might have been, Mr. Kelly made an interesting legal argument. Under Maryland Law, Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article (“CJP”) §11-504(b)(5), a judgment debtor under certain circumstances can exempt up to $6,000 in cash or other property from a levy to satisfy a money judgment. This law typically applies to debts like unpaid bills, breach of contract, etc . . .

Ultimately the Court of Special Appeals ruled that Kelly was an “obligor” but not a “debtor” for the purposes of the two different laws.  As such, the exemption in CJP § 11-504(b)(5) did not apply to efforts to collect unpaid child support payments, the judgment of the circuit court was accordingly affirmed, and OCSE could take the money in Mr. Kelly’s bank account to pay some of his back child support.

So, do you know the difference between the terms “debtor” and “obligor?” It might turn out to be important to you on some future day. And, if someone says “What’s in a name?” you can refer them to the Maryland Court of Special Appeals.

About Tim Leahy

Timothy P. Leahy, a partner at the firm, practices law in Maryland and the District of Columbia and is a member of the American, Maryland, D.C, and Prince George’s County Bar associations. He received his J.D., cum laude, from the University of Baltimore Law School in May 2000, earned his M.B.A. in 1993 at the University of Maryland’s Robert H. Smith School of Business, and his B.S. in Transportation & Logistics at Maryland in 1990. Timothy brings over 10 years experience in business to his practice of the law and focuses on litigation and general practice matters. A former home improvement contractor and army reservist, he volunteers with Christmas in April and has coached for the Bowie Boys & Girls Club. He is a Board member of his homeowners association, pro bono counsel for Bowie CLAW, and a volunteer Mediator for the District Court of Maryland. Timothy moved to Bowie in 1982 and lives there with his wife of 24 years and two sons.
This entry was posted in Profiles. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *